Introduction
Trip distribution is the second step of conventional four-step transport models. The main purpose of trip distribution modeling is to distribute the total number of trips originating in each zone among all possible destination zones available. As input, it uses a set of zonal trip productions and attractions, and attempts to estimate the way in which the production and attraction will be linked.
The trip distribution model may be expressed in a general form as follows:
Tij=(fTi,Tj,Fij)............(1)
Here Tij is the traffic moving between zones i and j; and Fij is the impedance to travel between i and j and can be represented by travel distance, time, costs, or a combination of them.
Tij = K Ti Tj ( Fij ) n
n = constant power
Gravity models stipulate that the amount of traffic interaction between zone I and zone j is positively related to the product of the amount of traffic in zone I and zone j and inversely related to the impedance of getting from zone i to zone j. The K in equation 2 is a constant used to scale the estimate up or down, and the power n permits the friction or impedance factor to be manipulated in model estimation.
Objectives
In order to fulfill the main purposes of this study, the following objective is taken to conduct the study-
Ø To calculate the number of trips produced in inter-city train services from
Methodology
To conduct this study a simple methodology is followed and that is described in bellow.
Table.1: Informations about the Destinations.
a) Data Collection:
The value of the parameters of gravity model is to be collected for calculation of trip distribution. Railway sector is randomly pre-selected for this study. Destination, distances and number of trips produced in those destinations are documented through an interview with station master as secondary data. Collected values are given bellow.
Table.1: Informations about the Destinations
Origin | Destination | Distance (In km.) | Produced trip / day |
| Noapara | 29 | 100 |
Jessore | 57 | 150 | |
Darshana Halt | 124 | 50 | |
Chuadanga | 139 | 70 | |
Poradaha | 179 | 30 | |
Iswardi | 247 | 30 | |
Rajshahi | 307 | 270 | |
Dinajpur | 440 | 110 | |
Natore | 283 | 95 | |
Parbotipur | 423 | 25 | |
Sayedpur | 437 | 235 | |
Joydebpur | 503 | 190 | |
Sirajgonj | 324 | 150 | |
| 530 | 220 | |
Total | | | 1725 |
Source: Field Survey, 2008.
As secondary data, the population of
Table.2: Informations about the No. of population of Origin and Destination.
Origin ( | Population | Destination | Population |
| 2378971 | Noapara | 250319 |
Jessore | 2471554 | ||
Darshana Halt | 719378 | ||
Chuadanga | 1007130 | ||
Poradaha | 1740155 | ||
Iswardi | 292938 | ||
Rajshahi | 2286874 | ||
Dinajpur | 2642850 | ||
Natore | 1521336 | ||
Parbotipur | 325070 | ||
Sayedpur | 232209 | ||
Joydebpur | 2631891 | ||
Sirajgonj | 2693814 | ||
| 8511228 |
Source: BBS, 2004.
b) Model Fixation and Calculation:
First a suitable model is established. Then by using necessary computer software Ms Excel results are produced with collected data.
c) Final Report Presentation:
Finally with the analysis, necessary figures and tables a final report was prepared finally.
Model Fixation
As mentioned before gravity model needs a production factor (Ti) of origin which is applied by the population of Khulna and attraction factor (Tj) of destination is applied by population of destination. Value of Friction factor (Fij) is applied by the distance between origin and destination Value of socio-economic factor K is taken 1 to reduce the complexity of calculation. Value of n (power of friction factor) is taken 2 as default.
So the number of trips from i to j,
=
( Fij ) 2
With MSExel value of Tij is derived. Values are listed bellow.
Population ( Ti ) | Destination | Population (Tj) | Distance (Fij) | Impedance ( Fij ) 2 | Predicted Tij |
2378971 | Noapara | 250319 | 29 | 841 | 708087564.5 |
Jessore | 2471554 | 57 | 3249 | 1809712309 | |
Darshana Halt | 719378 | 124 | 15376 | 111301990.1 | |
Chuadanga | 1007130 | 139 | 19321 | 124006679.9 | |
Poradaha | 1740155 | 179 | 32041 | 129202530.5 | |
Iswardi | 292938 | 247 | 61009 | 11422757.41 | |
Rajshahi | 2286874 | 307 | 94249 | 57723762.87 | |
Dinajpur | 2642850 | 440 | 193600 | 32475534.65 | |
Natore | 1521336 | 283 | 80089 | 45189904.05 | |
Parbotipur | 325070 | 423 | 178929 | 4322005.393 | |
Sayedpur | 232209 | 437 | 190969 | 2892712.833 | |
Joydebpur | 2631891 | 503 | 253009 | 24746915.58 | |
Sirajgonj | 2693814 | 324 | 104976 | 61047338.3 | |
| 8511228 | 530 | 280900 | 72082465.6 |
From these calculated values of Tij and actual number of trips to different destination actual probability and predicted probability is calculated. The bars bellow show their differences
Figure: Actual and predicted probability
From this chart it is clear that predicted probabilities are not applicable due to the desperation from calculated value. So incorporating socio-economic factor K is very essential. Correlation between actual probabilities and predicted probabilities is 0.041. It means a common K is not applicable. So Kij (socio-economic factor between i and j) have to be applied. But due to the unavailability of sufficient data Kij is not calculable.
Conclusion
This study is a small afford for trip distribution analysis. A very general gravity model is used to calculate number of trips to different destination. Enormous prediction has been occurred. But the process is in write way.
References
1. D.Meyer, M. and Miller, E. J., 2001: Urban Transportation Planning (P.279).
No comments:
Post a Comment